Advertisement

Will Rogers

June 07, 2000

Will Rogers

Congressman Jim Rogan and his challenger, state Sen. Adam Schiff, just

wouldn't stay out of my house last weekend.

Neither actually came by, which is good because I was dangerously low

on cheese and crackers. But it seemed every time I looked up I saw the

grinning puss of one or the other.

Their dueling TV commercials received a lot of press, and both

Advertisement

campaigns put out literature.

Rogan's commercials, airing earlier in the campaign and more often

than those of any congressional candidate in the nation, have all the

subtlety of a Mad Magazine parody, showing as little respect for voters

as they do for Schiff.

*

Tactics include a grainy mug shot of Schiff, which I guess proves to

simpletons that he's seamy, and scripts that play like bumper stickers

read aloud. But they add less to useful discourse than comparatively

literate bumper bromides.

By distorting the substance of bills Schiff voted on (a tactic both

candidates use), Rogan deems Schiff an extremist hoping to give away our

money to illegal aliens.

One has to wonder what the wildly expensive ads accomplish. The

shrieks speak to an audience already sure to vote for Rogan, this despite

any concern his support for gun enthusiasts, for teaching religion in

public schools and for busting the cruel chains of consumer protection

strangling business aren't conservative enough.

"Greedy trial lawyers" is the slander of the season describing

puppeteers who, according to Rogan's spots, pull Schiff's strings. Next

Rogan will refer to his own backers as the "kindly insurance companies."

*

Just as Rogan derides Schiff's backers with ludicrous, sweeping

labels, Schiff paints all Rogan's fans as "special interests," this

despite ample evidence of support from voters in the community.

Each offers an ugly portrait of all who give the other guy cash,

suggesting their own donors are selfless monks devoted to integrity.

Rogan defends his antics with his "he did it first!" defense, a whine of

victimhood the arbiter of virtue uses every election to justify tactics

he claims to abhor.

Schiff has only one commercial thus far, rebutting Rogan's account of

their respective records on health-care issues. Details of the bills each

man supported or opposed are recited by a woman apparently at the center

of a story Schiff has told for more than a year. The constituent came to

Schiff for help when an insurance company denied requested treatment for

a life-threatening illness.

The story is effective, but Schiff had better find another because

Glendale News-Press Articles
|
|
|