Advertisement

Glendale officials defend water supply

September 08, 2000

Buck Wargo

CITY HALL -- Los Angeles County Supervisor Michael Antonovich's

questioning of the safety of Glendale's drinking water has city officials

steamed and asking about his motivation.

Antonovich, whose district includes Glendale, issued a statement late

Wednesday stating that bottled water was superior to the city's tap

water. Glendale's water containsaluminum, arsenic, barium, copper and

Advertisement

lead and has higher levels of trihalomethanes and coliform bacteria than

averages of 202 brands of bottled water tested by the county, Antonovich

stated.

His comments prompted a response from Glendale officials that the

drinking water supply meets state and federal standards and is safe. More

than 90% of Glendale's drinking water comes from the Metropolitan Water

District of Southern California, which supplies most of the water in the

region.

"I don't know why he said what he said," said Glendale Councilwoman

Ginger Bremberg. "I am truly astonished. Maybe it is bandwagon time.

Everybody is climbing on a new issue to toot their horns."

Antonovich said Thursday his lone motivation was to let the public

know what is in the water they are drinking. A bottled water user, he

said he used information mailed to his home by Glendale Water & Power in

July for a comparison. He had Wasfy Shindy, deputy director of the county

EnvironmentalToxicology Bureau do the comparison.

"Some people think it is unsafe to have that type of material in one's

drinking water," Antonovich said. "That is why when babies are born, they

have them drink distilled water. It shows MWD has a problem, and it's

water is not as pure."

Los Angeles County has no regulatory control over municipal water

systems like Glendale's. David Spath, chief of drinking water and

environmental management for the state Department of Health Services,

which does, said it is unfair to call the tap water unsafe.

"It is not fair to people providing the water and residents," Spath

said. "To say it is not safe is not the case at all. It is doing an

injustice."

State and federal regulations allow a small amount of contaminants in

the water as long as it doesn't exceed a certain thresholds.

Antonovich questioned trihalomethanes, a carcinogen and byproduct of

mixing chlorine with organic material, being 45 parts per billion in

comparison to .68 parts per billion in bottled water. The standard is 100

parts per billion.

The supervisor also questioned Glendale's coliform bacteria test of

.66%. The state allows 5% a month.

Don Froelich, the city's water administrator, said the .66% represents

one positive test out of 1,800 done a year and a follow-up test showed no

contamination.

Froelich questioned why Glendale was singled out when more than 100

cities in the county use the same water supply from the Colorado River

and Northern California.

"Probably every water in the world has a little bit of this and a

little bit of that. Unless it is distilled, it will have minerals in it,"

Froelich said.

Antonovich said he may request similar comparisons with other

municipal water systems. Supervisors have already called for testing for

chromium 6, a known carcinogen, at county buildings in light of publicity

of a two-year-old recommendation on changing the state standard for the

contaminant.

Glendale is also testing for chromium 6 in its supply, but officials

expect it to be undetectable in tap water.

Glendale News-Press Articles
|
|
|