Advertisement

Will Rogers

February 08, 2002

At this week's Glendale City Council meeting, Councilman Dave Weaver

was asked to comment on the aftermath of his demands the previous week

that no one with an "agenda" should "lobby" him regarding candidates the

council considers for appointment to various volunteer boards. That

aftermath included a news article, a scathing column from me, and letters

and e-mails from residents who, despite his apparent prohibition, were

eager to tell Weaver exactly what they think. The appointment under

Advertisement

discussion at the time was for a seat on the planning board.

For those who missed this week's session, here's what Weaver said:

"We're all human. We all use the English language, and sometimes we

use a word here or there that we [might later] say 'well, there could

have been a better choice of words.' Using lobbying in the context that

it was used, it was not the best word to use. There's more to it than I

care to discuss publicly, because I don't feel that it benefits anybody

for me to speak out and hurt people unintentionally."

Weaver's apparent regret over using the word lobby didn't satisfy me

much. Referencing the applications of those who ask for appointments, two

weeks ago Weaver said, "I have a brain. I can read." The word used to

characterize the unsolicited opinions of citizens isn't nearly as

significant as an elected official flatly declaring they don't want

public input.

Ironically, there was some vital information Weaver didn't know about

the applicants that was known to and could have been shared by literally

every person who tried to lobby him. He accidentally revealed that little

glitch this week, just after expressing his regret for having used the

word "lobby."

Weaver explained the process by which he sorted through the candidates

two weeks ago, when he and his colleagues voted to reappoint the

incumbent. In short, he didn't.

"We never asked the city clerk to advertise [the upcoming vacancy on

the planning board], and there was no list [of applicants] provided,"

Weaver said at this week's meeting. "We had no other list of names to

look at, other than the individual we were planning to appoint."

Weaver didn't have to weigh candidates because, aside from his support

for what he says is a tradition of automatically reappointing incumbents

who've provided adequate service, he thought there were no other

candidates. Whoo-o-ops! He thought wrong.

The councilman who two weeks ago didn't need help choosing from among

the candidates didn't even know there were other candidates. City Clerk

Glendale News-Press Articles
|
|
|