Advertisement

Act of defiance or simply indifference?

January 30, 2004

DON MEREDITH

As I rode my police motorcycle north on Maryland Avenue, I heard the

screech of brakes, a honking horn and the exchange of uncomplimentary

words. Fortunately, I witnessed the cause of the commotion. "Chris,"

the pedestrian, had decided he needed to cross the street. So without

looking, he stepped into the roadway ... and to his surprise a car

was bearing down on him. Yet, Chris continued to cross. He glared at

Advertisement

the car's driver with a defiant, rude stare, almost as if he had an

entitlement to the roadway.

Meanwhile the driver, "Pam," had to brake hard to keep from

striking the pedestrian. She managed to stop the car in time, only to

catch the defiant glare of the pedestrian who continued his illegal

walk across the street.

After issuing this pedestrian a written invitation to explain it

to the judge, I was on my way. Not five minutes later, I saw a car

driven by "Dean" driving north on Central Avenue. A pedestrian,

"Theresa," was crossing the street in a crosswalk. She had entered

the crosswalk against the red "Don't Walk" sign. As she entered the

crosswalk, "Dean" honked his horn at her and pointed to the red

"Don't Walk" signal. "Theresa" simply gave him a dirty look and kept

walking.

Now frustrated, I stopped and asked her why she crossed against

the light. Her response was, "It's just a light, and pedestrians

always have the right of way." Once again, I found myself explaining

the law, and she, too, received a written invitation to see the

judge.

Then, a little later in the day, I saw not one, not two, but three

vehicles make a right turn on the green light at Broadway and

Glendale Avenue. Unfortunately, there were several pedestrians

crossing the street. One pedestrian was reading a newspaper as he

walked; another was busy chatting on a cellphone. In this case, the

pedestrians had the right of way, but almost got hit because of

inattention. Once the pedestrians had cleared, I went after the three

vehicles. I managed to catch only two of them. I explained the reason

why I had stopped them. The first driver, "Clark," said he did not

stop before turning, as the pedestrians had yet to enter his lane.

The second driver, "Claudia," responded that she was just following

the other car, so it must have been safe.

With exasperation, I provided two more invitations to attend a

performance with the judge. The frightening part of this little story

is that two pedestrians defiantly violated the law and three were

indifferent to their surroundings while crossing the street. The

Glendale News-Press Articles
|
|
|