Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: Glendale HomeCollections

A city of this size should have animal-care facilities...

March 15, 2004

A city of this size should have animal-care facilities

While acknowledging budget constraints, it is still very sad that

the third-largest city in the largest county in the United States has

no animal-services facility of its own ("Council says no to new

animal shelter," Feb. 12).

Residents of a city of 200,000 should not have to travel all the

way to Pasadena for quality animal services, nor wait for its staff

Advertisement

to travel here, with all due respect and gratitude for that fine, but

overburdened, facility.

I'm not alone in agonizing over the money unwisely or

inefficiently spent from the city treasury in the past few years,

which could have been invested in a state-of-the-art animal facility.

Meanwhile, the city should be, but is not, professionally and

aggressively pursuing corporate and other funding, as well as land,

with this future project in mind. The excellent feasibility study, in

whose focus group I participated, cost $53,000, which I hope will not

be wasted.

Perhaps a portion of the projected $3 million in tax revenues the

new Town Center will generate annually in its beginning years will

find its way to an animal-services facility budget.

JOANNE HEDGE

Glendale

Louvers could be redone, reduce energy costs

The Feb. 24 front-page article about the Glendale Federal building

states that it is "doubtful [the louvers removed from the building]

can be restored."

Actually, architects familiar with restoration techniques and

designing new uses for old buildings have assured me the louvers

could be remade to the original specifications. Even better, it seems

to me, would be to use modern materials that would recreate the

essential look and style of the former louvers while providing

greater transparency. This might have the added benefit of reducing

energy costs and justifying an energy tax credit.

There are lots of great ideas out there for how the building could

be adaptively reused to add excitement and attract tenants.

Innovative materials and design concepts abound. While political and

legal controversy about the building will take its inevitably

protracted course, the building slips further into disuse and

deterioration. I hope the owners will bring on board architects and

designers who have the skills and know-how needed to do the project

right. Our city deserves nothing less than the best.

DEBORAH DENTLER

Chairwoman, Glendale Historic Preservation Committee

Why is the city settling for the same-old same-old?

I have been a Glendale resident and property owner for more than

Glendale News-Press Articles
|
|
|