Advertisement

School: then and now

April 01, 2005

DAN KIMBER

Had a visit from an old friend recently. Our former principal, Don

Duncan, who devoted 20 years of his professional life to Hoover High

School, stopped by. He was my teacher and basketball coach back in

'66 and then my colleague and principal for more than 20 years at

Hoover. I have great respect for and many good memories of this man.

The two of us reminisced over a lunch, and he gave me something I'd

Advertisement

like to share with all of you. It was a list with two columns on it,

one marked, "Then," the other marked, "Now."

Then, for Duncan, reaches back 40 years, and includes a lifetime

of memories and observations. Unlike so many in my profession who

become bitter toward the end of their careers, Don has stayed active

(I repeat, after 40 years) and very positive in his approach to

teaching. Here are mostly his thoughts with a few of mine thrown in

for good measure.

Then: Everyone spoke English.

Now: Most students' first language is other than English. (With

all due deference to diversity, I do look forward to better days when

all of our students are fluent English speakers.)

Then: The choicest parking spot went to the principal.

Now: It is given to the police.

Then: Supervision was an administrative task.

Now: It goes to security guards and resource officers.

Then: We had fire drills.

Now: We have lock-down drills.

(Uniformed guards, metal bars enclosing campuses, weapons searches

-- it's high school U.S.A., 21st century. While our society,

families, schools manage a steady spew of malcontents and miscreants

-- including our children -- we're all supposed to be a little more

on guard. When things do go wrong, fingers point in all directions. I

only know that I look forward to a day when our public schools no

longer require a police presence.)

Then: Class size was too large.

Now: Class size is too large.

(Thirty years ago, when I entered the profession, 25 students per

class was the absolute maximum. We understood then that exceeding

that number diluted the effectiveness of the teacher and slowed the

progress of each and every learner in the class. Despite that most

obvious correlation, we have managed, over the years, to cram more

and more students into the same spaces, increasing the acceptable

maximum for the sake of "budgetary constraints." Presently we are

accepting 40 students in a class -- it's not the norm, but not

unusual.)

Then: There were chalkboards.

Now: There are whiteboards.

Then: There were carbons and dittos.

Now: There are photocopies.

Glendale News-Press Articles
|
|
|