Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: Glendale HomeCollections

Helter Skelter where you'd least expect it

July 22, 2005

CHARLES UNGER

It's not easy to have your murder conviction overturned due to

ineffective assistance of counsel, however, if you are foolish enough

to compare your client to Charles Manson, that is one of the ways.

This is the amazing story of Richard Boyde, who in 1982 was

convicted of robbery, kidnapping and murder. The victim was a clerk

at a 7-Eleven store in Riverside County. At his trial Boyde was

Advertisement

represented by Deputy Public Defender Malcolm MacMillan. After Boyde

was found guilty, they proceeded to the sentencing phase. It is here

that the prosecutor, if he wishes, asks for the death penalty in this

type of case and the defense attorney is supposed to make every

possible argument he can to save the life of his client.

Somewhat unbelievably, in his final argument, MacMillan made a

reference to the movie "Helter Skelter," which dealt with the murders

committed by Manson and his followers and proceeded to tell the jury

that Boyde was similar to Manson and that both were products of their

environment.

"I am a child of your prisons," MacMillan said quoting Manson's

exact words at his own capital trial. "You may blame me all you wish,

but I was taught and learned to live and breathe in your

institutions, your prisons. And Richard Boyde, to a certain extent,

is a child of your institutions."

Yes, this is what MacMillan said.

Perhaps he forgot he was working for the defense and thought he

had suddenly become the prosecutor.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals led by well-regarded

conservative Judge Alex Kozinski found that this glaring error among

others constituted ineffective assistance of counsel and the judges

overturned the death sentence. Judge Kozinski said that he couldn't

think of a worse way to try to gain sympathy for one's client. And as

he put it, "It is difficult to conceive of any possible justification

for referring to a notorious mass murderer in trying to persuade the

jury to spare Boyde's life, and certainly not one that warrants

comparing Boyde to that murderer."

MacMillan was contacted after the 9th Circuit's ruling and

acknowledged that the Manson argument was not his finest moment.

Believe it or not, that wasn't all that the appellate court had to

rely on.

It turns out that Boyde had about as bad a childhood as one could

have suffering both sexual abuse and beatings by his parents.

MacMillan never introduced these mitigating factors into evidence and

in fact did just the opposite, putting Boyde's mother and stepfather

Glendale News-Press Articles
|
|
|