Advertisement

A picture that was worth a few words My first...

September 29, 2005|By:

A picture that was worth a few words

My first thought on seeing the artist's rendering of the proposed

Newport Beach city hall was that it looked like an industrial

warehouse. My second thought was that it looked like an ugly

industrial warehouse.

They can't be serious about this, can they?

MATT MATTEUCCI

Advertisement

Newport Beach

Reason should prevail in city hall debate

Once again the self-proclaimed members of the no-city-hall group

have proven that they rely on rhetoric, exaggeration and inflammatory

remarks rather than facts in expressing opposition to proposed

actions of our City Council ("Newport council should scale back plans

for city hall," Sept. 1). The response in the Daily Pilot to Mayor

Heffernan's quite factual article is full of inaccuracies and ignores

reality in the name of persuading folks to believe his point of view.

While perhaps well meaning, this brand of commentary needs to be

answered.

The massive indebtedness mentioned to build a Taj Mahal is an

exaggeration. There are not excessively large rooms or extra

facilities, just enough room to house our city staff and adequately

serve the public. Adequate space is provided for the staff and

residents to park. A proper fire station is included, which most of

us would support. These are all in one project, at one time, which is

why the cost is what it is.

The higher rate of interest and cost for the financing method is

minuscule compared with bonds. Bonds would also raise the cost to

residents because it would be added to their tax bills. If we wait to

replace City Hall it will just cost more at a later date, and it can

easily be afforded now because the cost fits into our city budget.

And we would avoid the costs of keeping the old building maintained.

This financing method also has less risk to the city in case of a

future calamity which might damage the building.

Opponents want to control excessive government expenditures. What

are these excessive expenditures? Opponents refer to oversized

bureaucracy in our city government. This is another unfounded and

unsubstantiated remark. We don't believe that our city government is

overly large, and it is doubtful that opponents could find waste or

inappropriate activities that currently exist. They just want to

criticize everyone and suggest that all is not well. Our city

government is certainly not out of control. No one really believes

that.

Perhaps the reason for the continued criticism without facts is

that opponents are just unhappy that their candidates did not get

Glendale News-Press Articles
|
|
|