Advertisement

Voters turning out early

Absentee ballots cast for Crescenta Valley election have already more than doubled last year’s.

November 03, 2007|By Ryan Vaillancourt
(Page 2 of 2)

While critics have argued that a dog park would take away from existing park uses, the candidate field, while divided about where a dog park should go, largely supports the idea.

Among the newcomers, Arnold, Davis and Kilpatrick picked up the endorsement of members of the steering committee of Crescenta Valley Heritage, a nonprofit group that works to preserve the architectural, cultural and historic resources of the valley.

“They were the ones that were the most clear about being slow-growth advocates,” committee member Mike Lawler said. “That’s bottom line. Everybody else was a little bit hemming and hawing about it. Although they may have advocated for it, it was always with conditions.”

Advertisement

Arnold, Davis, Kilpatrick and van Bremen all said they would support a moratorium on multifamily development.

Andrus and Beyt said they would not support the theoretical moratorium, and Marshall-Creel — who at a candidate forum said that “maybe” she would support such a moratorium — later said people have a right to develop their property according to how it’s zoned.


 RYAN VAILLANCOURT covers business, politics and the foothills. He may be reached at (818) 637-3215 or by e-mail at ryan.vaillancourt@latimes.com.

Glendale News-Press Articles
|
|
|