Anger among cities throughout the state has been brewing since the 2006-07 fiscal year, when they lost a reprieve from county charges and saw property tax administration fees balloon.
The lawsuit, which is expected to be filed later this month, would seek reimbursement from the county, plus interest, on the higher charges and force a different rate structure.
“It really should have been a nominal fee,” Senior Assistant City Atty. Lucy Varpetian said.
Instead, Glendale is paying about $308,000 more than it was before 2006, Varpetian said.
County auditors contend that figure is closer to $288,000. Either way, the recouped funds would be a welcome reprieve during a tight fiscal year, city officials said.
Los Angeles County holds $13.5 million of the $40 million that counties statewide have allegedly overcharged their cities, said Michael Colantuono, the lead attorney representing the cities, which include Cerritos, Paramount and Sierra Madre.
Long Beach, Santa Monica and Culver City are all contemplating joining the lawsuit.
County governments are charged with collecting and redistributing property tax revenue to their respective cities and, according to state code, are allowed to charge fees that “shall not exceed the actual cost of providing these services.”
During the 2004 financial crisis, state lawmakers gave cities a greater share of property tax revenues to make up for a decreased share of sales taxes that were used to pay off a $15-billion voter-approved bond measure.
City officials contend increased county administration charges have unfairly siphoned off that compensation.
“They’re saying what they think the law should be, not what the law is,” Colantuono said.