Advertisement

Metrolink case in court

Man was convicted in criminal trial, but civil liability remains unsettled in 2005 crash.

October 08, 2008|By Veronica Rocha

LOS ANGELES — A civil court judge Tuesday heard arguments from defense attorneys about liability and costs in a class-action lawsuit regarding the 2005 Metrolink train derailment in Glendale that killed 11 people.

Attorney Brian Hershman, who represents Los Angeles County and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, complained to Judge Emilie Elias during a hearing at the Central Civil West Courthouse that the Sheriff’s Department is being held just as liable as Metrolink in the lawsuit.

“There are numerous allegations about what could have caused the Metrolink derailment,” Hershman said.

He argued that because the plaintiffs in the lawsuit said the Sheriff’s Department did nothing wrong in connection with the Jan. 26, 2005, Metrolink train derailment, the county shouldn’t have to pay costs in the case.

Advertisement

But Attorney James Wakefeld, who represents Metrolink, told Elias the county had the opportunity to remove itself from liability in the class-action lawsuit but didn’t.

Eleven passengers were killed and nearly 200 others injured when Compton resident Juan Manuel Alvarez parked his Jeep Cherokee on the Metrolink tracks near Chevy Chase Drive, close to the Glendale-Los Angeles border, on Jan. 26, 2005.

Alvarez was sentenced Aug. 20 in criminal court to serve 11 consecutive life sentences in prison after he was convicted in June for causing the deadly train derailment.

Survivors of the crash and family members of the deceased filed a wrongful-death and personal-injury lawsuit against Metrolink after the crash. The county and Sheriff’s Department were later brought in as additional defendants. Hershman said the civil lawsuit questions whether the Sheriff’s Department did enough to stop Alvarez from parking his Jeep Cherokee on the tracks.

The plaintiffs, in their class-action suit, claimed that the train’s operating system — known as “push-pull”— was potentially dangerous.

The “push” mode of train operation refers to when the train’s engine is in the rear of the train, pushing it from the back; the “pull” mode is when the engine is pulling the train from the front.

The lawsuit argues that the push-pull system failed to prevent the crash. Earlier this year, however, Metrolink went to the state court of appeals to find out whether the allegation had any merit, and the court ruled that the plaintiffs couldn’t argue that the railroad authority’s practice was negligent.


 VERONICA ROCHA covers public safety and the courts. She may be reached at (818) 637-3232 or by e-mail at veronica.rocha@ latimes.com.

Glendale News-Press Articles
|
|
|