District officials have said revenue from a bond extension or parcel tax would be tied to programs or construction costs, not personnel expenses, which were included in the survey to gauge negative opinion.
But even with a grassroots group organized by parents to support a parcel tax extensions, school district officials have been wary of putting it on the ballot given the budget pinch being felt among residents during the economic downturn.
"Many of the pieces we want to see in place for a measure to be successful are in place," McLarney told board members on Tuesday. "You have a very solid base line support for the measure, you have popular projects … and you have a number of arguments that resonate."
Extending the 1997 general obligation bond would maintain property tax rates for a fixed number of years into the future, phasing in around 2017 as income from the current lifespan of the bond starts to drop off. Successful passage requires 55% voter approval.
Surveyors presented several questionnaires during the summer. One featured arguments against the bond extension based on the economic recession, administrative mismanagement and bloated public employee salaries and pensions. Even with negative framing of the extension, 59% of respondents said they'd approve it in the 2011 April election, McLarney said.
"The real telling question is after these negatives, what happens to your support," he said. "It ticks down, but…you're still at that threshold needed for passage."
District officials submitted an insolvent budget to county regulators in June, and continue to project deficit spending through 2012-13.
In October, the Board of Education is expected to discuss the feasibility of putting a bond extension on the 2011 ballot, Supt. Dick Sheehan said.