For most of the 40% of Glendale that lives south of the Ventura (134) Freeway, this system doesn't work. Political activism is a luxury item. Organizing neighborhoods requires feet on the ground, a structure with resources, enough free time to hold meetings and a mechanism to assemble and disseminate information. For most of the residents in South Glendale struggling in this economy, it just isn't possible.
Under these conditions, how can their concerns be channeled into effective representation? Not even Adams Hill can pretend to effectively represent what those along the San Fernando corridor or the high density complexes north of Green street need from their city and it isn't fair to dismiss them simply because they don't have the means to organize. It is also unrealistic to assume that council members are always paying attention.
The disparity becomes clear with small issues. When a low-income housing project met resistance in northern Glendale, it was put on hold while such projects are routinely green lighted in the south. This is not to imply that these complexes are a bad thing, quite the contrary. It is simply a little suspect that the distribution of these projects is decidedly skewed away from spheres of political influence. If these projects are a burden, they should be shared by everyone.
The proposals to raise fares on the Bee Line and reduce services disproportionately affects southern Glendale. Even though the fares are inexpensive and could justifiably be raised a small degree, the four-fold increase in fairs and reductions in service in the less economically affluent areas would have a dramatic impact on struggling residents ability to get to work and meet the needs of their families.