Advertisement

Making practical sense of water works

November 08, 2010
(Page 2 of 2)

The alternative would allow Glendale Water & Power to avoid a projected $2-million waterside deficit, which is forcing the utility to defer critical maintenance and repairs. It would also negate Glendale Water & Power's call for another water rate increase, which some council members admit is a back-door tax.

Under the alternative, City Council would reduce this year's water fund transfer to the city's General Fund from $4.2 million to $2.2 million. This would leave Glendale Water & Power with an additional $2 million to resolve its water-works fiscal problems and keep operations functioning properly. It will also require the City Council to make additional cuts in city spending.

Cutting another $2 million from the General Fund budget is not an ideal solution, but it is preferable to hitting ratepayers with another water rate increase. In just the past three years, utility customers have been dealt three double-digit rate increases.

Advertisement

The General Fund budget is $173 million. It covers numerous city services and hundreds of city employees. Identifying cuts of $2 million, or about 1.2% of this large budget, should not be impossible.

It is time for council to stop transferring millions of dollars from Glendale Water & Power every year needed by the utility to maintain safe, reliable operations.

And it is time for the City Council to stop contributing to Glendale Water & Power's financial problems and then socking ratepayers with repeated rate hikes to stem the fiscal bleeding.

Bob Getz

Glendale

Glendale News-Press Articles
|
|
|