Traffic and ethics top forum subjects

On traffic flow and enforcement, Manoukian suggested increased police presence and public-education campaigns, but also encouraged employers to vary work times to decrease rush-hour traffic.

Drayman also pointed to completing implementation of the downtown mobility plan.

But Weaver was more skeptical, saying that there was no “magic bullet” for the city’s traffic problems, although he suggested installing additional red-light cameras.

“People just don’t care,” he said. “They’re going to break the law no matter what laws you put in.”

Most candidates said they would support a code of ethics for city employees and elected officials.

“This would benefit both elected officials and the public as well,” Drayman said.

Mohill said ethics rules are especially important in light of the thousands of dollars donated to council members by subcontractors of affordable-housing developer Advanced Development & Investment Inc., which is under federal investigation for allegedly defrauding cities across the state of millions of dollars. He also called out Weaver’s $9,000 fine in 2009 from the Fair Political Practices Commission for violating state campaign finance laws.

“The public trust has been lost in this election and I’d like to restore it,” Mohill said.

Similar to other candidate forums held this season, the candidates zeroed in on their plans to address the city’s budget gap and the ongoing threat of state budget cuts.