It's not the best way to handle a civic issue, I admit, but we all need to take a stand for something in life.
In response to our complaints to the city over the years, they've sent motorcycle officers to monitor our street and witness the drag races. They parked mobile radar guns to track their frequency and speed. But, like nuclear weapons, this only served as a momentary deterrent.
So what's a neighborhood to do when it becomes the shortcut of choice for lead-footed commuters? Petition the city for speed bumps, that’s what.
But in the parlance of Burbank civil engineering, they're called speed humps, not bumps. If you know the difference, please enlighten me.
Imagine our collective surprise when we received a letter in the mail notifying our little corner of America that the City Council would be debating the approval of funds for said humps in their upcoming session. Why this decision needed to go before the council, which certainly had better things to do, I'll never know. But I've never understood the ways of the political world, local or otherwise. Heck, I voted for Perot.
We came to find, in fact, that the collected data from the city’s traffic monitoring had made its way to the proper authorities. The research had been done — the City Manager and civil engineers were actually in favor of our hump funding.
So, on a recent Tuesday night, a representative band of concerned parents, sans Scotch and merlot, besieged the City Council meeting to plead our case.
It didn't take long for me to remember why I like being a human-interest writer rather than a City Hall watchdog. Though so necessary to our political process, the local City Council meeting is like a prostate exam. An awkward trial for all participants, but essential for our own good.