This is a condensed version of my open response to Weaver:
Mr. Weaver, as you pointed out in your comments, most roads in Glendale cannot be widened. Moving people around efficiently with the roads we have is key; whether by car, bus, foot or bike. You are certainly correct that most people will still get around by car. It will just get more difficult as more cars clog the roads and gas prices continue to rise. These are inevitabilities.
I bike to work in downtown Glendale every day — a little over a mile. It takes me six or seven minutes. It would take me longer to drive, as I would have to drive up to the third floor of a parking structure and walk down to ground level. A bike is the most efficient choice for my commute.
It's also a more efficient choice for the city: every day, my bike is one less car clogging up Brand Boulevard and one less car taking up space in a city parking structure. I am actively reducing congestion, and the fact that it makes me healthier, saves money and is fun is just gravy.
There are many others throughout the city for whom riding bikes short distances would also be an efficient choice — if they felt it was safe to do so. As you pointed out, being on a bike in Glendale can be very unsafe. This is a situation a great city like Glendale should be ashamed of.
Providing a network of bike routes is a public safety issue. Glendale has fallen far behind neighboring cities in providing for the needs of its residents in this regard. To neglect to provide basic amenities that can increase the public safety of my fellow residents — your constituents — is not realistic, it is defeatist.
I ask that you reconsider your attitude and research cities such as Long Beach that have successfully created safe bike routes.
Keep on eye on the union’s motives