Dissatisfied with the MTA proposal, City Council members on Tuesday suggested officials draft a revenue-sharing agreement for the city to build two digital billboards, with the MTA getting a third along the city's main freeways. That scenario could generate $1.7 million in revenue annually for the city.
The council approved reviewing that scenario about an hour before approving a fiscal year 2012-13 budget that closed a $15.4-million shortfall.
While the MTA doesn't have to give Glendale a share of its revenue from the double-facing signs — or ask for permission to build them — city officials said the agency typically collaborates with local governments. Glendale's position is also helped by the fact that Councilman Ara Najarian is a member of MTA's board of directors.
“Clearly, the agency wants to maintain good relations with those cities from which their directors come,” Najarian said at the meeting.
The MTA proposed two signs to the north and south of the 134 Freeway near the railroad tracks that border Los Angeles, but council members said they preferred one sign for the agency south of the freeway.
Two MTA billboards would bring about $250,000 to city coffers, far less than the preferred option.
City officials don't know yet whether the MTA would be willing to lose one of itssigns, but a spokesman for the agency, Dave Sotero, said Thursday that the county was open to working with Glendale on a proposal.
“We are just in the early days of this issue, and we look forward to working cooperatively with the city to review all the alternatives and options,” Sotero said.
There could also be a second city-owned sign along the Golden State (5) Freeway near ABC7 studios, which already exists. However, Clear Channel's contract to keep that sign expires next year. The sign isn't digital, but that could change.