At the time, I was not a resident of Glendale and vowed not to frequent businesses in the city as a way of retaliating against a civic bureaucracy that would go out of its way to dog-pile financial penalties on top of parking violations. For the record, I exercised a lot of willpower and stayed out of Glendale for some time.
More recently, I was not particularly in favor of the Rossmoyne neighborhood, where I live, being named a historic district by the city. I have a bit of a problem with a city telling me what I can and can't do with the façade of my residence.
I understand the effort to preserve relevant architecture. And I do believe that the odds are more in favor of such preservation efforts helping, rather than hurting, home values in the neighborhood. But I become wary when city officials create regulations that are highly subjective because they involve rendering an aesthetic opinion.
Remember, this is a civic group who, in my aesthetic and professional opinion, botched the rebranding of our city. We're supposed to entrust them with decisions regarding our personal property?
Only time will tell if this distinction is a benefit to homeowners, or a burden.
And just last week, I was contacted by Nancy Black, a fellow resident, who was outraged when she received a notice from the city clerk's office indicating that she is required to pay for a kennel license simply because, “It has been brought to the attention of this office that you have three dogs residing at your residence.”
According to the letter, Black now owes $100 for an application fee and then $50 per year for the kennel permit. A kennel permit is required if more than two dogs over the age of four months are housed at one location, with four being the maximum for a non-commercial kennel.