YOU ARE HERE: Glendale HomeCollectionsLetter

A Word, Please: An essay on the essentials of S

December 13, 2013|By June Casagrande

Around this time of year, I usually give out advice about how to avoid the errors people make forming plurals and possessives on their holiday cards.

You know, like how some people goof up and write “Merry Christmas from the Smith’s” or “Holiday party at the William’s” or “We’ll be at Thoma’s house.” Or how they write “Wishing you the best of the season and all it’s joys” or “Who’s house will we visit?”

But this year, instead of giving constructive advice, I’d like to assign blame. There is, in fact, a culprit responsible for all these errors and more. It’s the letter S.

The letter S is, I’m pretty sure, evil. It has too much power — too many special jobs to do — so it messes people up.

First, the letter S forms plurals. One cat, two cats. One shoe, two shoes. But you can’t always count on it. You can’t say one man, two mans or one box, two boxs. So in this, its biggest job, the letter S can let you down when you least suspect it.


The letter S also forms possessives. The cat’s tail, the shoe’s sole, the box’s lid. For this job, it teams up with an apostrophe. But again, you can’t just call on the letter S every time. Plural possessives usually use an apostrophe not followed by S: The cats’ tails, the shoes’ soles. Though, of course, irregular plurals do take the possessive S: men’s accessories, children’s books.

If that’s not confusing enough, a proper noun that ends in S, like Lois or James, can form its possessive with or without another S depending solely on which editing style you’re following. So in a newspaper you might see Lois’ hat, but in a book you’d see Lois’s hat.

Then, stooping even lower, the letter S likes to throw us a curve by forming possessive “its” all by itself, without the help of an apostrophe. So “The dog wagged its tail” takes no apostrophe.

Glendale News-Press Articles Glendale News-Press Articles