NEWS
By Dan Evans, dan.evans@latimes.com | February 23, 2013
We blew it. During the last few weeks, our editorial board stared long and hard at Burbank's proposed school bond, Measure S. We talked to proponents and opponents, and nearly drove ourselves batty looking at spreadsheets and amortization schedules. Though we did not come out against it, we said the $110-million borrowing plan had risks, and voters should vote it up or down based on their own threshold for danger. I still believe this, and stand by it. However, we erred in saying that the biggest risk was the uncertainty of interest rates in 2023 - the year the school, and by extension, you - would most likely begin paying back the “converter bonds.” In fact, the interest rate is set when the bonds are sold, something that would likely happen this year if the measure passes.
NEWS
By Brittany Levine, brittany.levine@latimes.com | February 5, 2013
Glendale could join the growing list of government agencies that conduct direct negotiations with bond issuers if voters approve Measure C on the April ballot. Supporters of the change say allowing for negotiated bonds - rather than only permitting the current process in which the city engages multiple investors in competitive bidding for the best deal - can save Glendale money and make the funding mechanism more efficient. But open government advocates and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission warn that ditching competitive bidding can lead to quid pro quo politics.
SPORTS
By Edgar Melik-Stepanyan, Special to the News-Press | May 18, 2011
GLENDALE — Hoover High School wants a new synthetic grass athletic field, similar to the ones at Glendale and Crescenta Valley. Glendale needs upgrades to its baseball and softball fields. Crescenta Valley desires new lights and bleachers for the school's football/soccer field, in addition to a refurbished swimming pool that would meet CIF standards for playoff matches. All three schools have a "wish list" of projects they hope to begin after the passage of Measure S, a $270-million bond measure that was passed on the April 5 ballot by Glendale voters.
NEWS
April 14, 2011
In the April 8th Glendale News-Press article, “Measure S supporters celebrate, look to future,” the article incorrectly states that “the union spent more than $40,000 criticizing the bond and championing school board candidates.” The Glendale Teachers Assn. did not spend one cent in an effort to defeat the bond measure. All the political action committee money went exclusively toward efforts in electing our recommended candidates for school board. I was not available for comment after the election as I was in Mexico during spring break.
NEWS
By Bill Kisliuk, bill.kisliuk@latimes.com | April 8, 2011
Last month, Glendale and Burbank officials worked quickly to protect their redevelopment agencies as debate reached a peak over Gov. Jerry Brown’s proposal to eliminate the 400 or so agencies statewide and reallocate the $5 billion they receive. Brown’s plan failed to receive the necessary legislative support in its first go-round, just as his overall budget proposal fell short. Since then, redevelopment officials have waited in near silence to find out whether the governor is still seeking to close the agencies by July 1, or if negotiations for a compromise will pick up again.
NEWS
By Megan O'Neil, megan.oneil@latimes.com | April 6, 2011
Glendale Unified school board members Mary Boger and Nayiri Nahabedian won reelection on Tuesday — and got a $270-million present. The money came in the form of Measure S, which voters approved on Tuesday by a landslide, ensuring that the district will have at least some guaranteed source of income as the state looks to close a multi-billion dollar budget gap. Measure S garnered 69.5% of the vote, well above the 55% needed to pass. The school board incumbents fought off challenges from a crowded field of eight candidates, with Boger largely bypassing personal campaigning in order to focus her attention on the bond.
NEWS
By Megan O'Neil, megan.oneil@latimes.com | March 16, 2011
The Glendale Teachers Assn. leadership came under heavy public criticism this week for its opposition to Measure S, a $270-million general obligation bond that would fund facility improvements and technology upgrades throughout the school district. The union leadership voted in January to oppose Measure S on the grounds that Glendale Unified officials declined to guarantee that from $19 to $20 million in general money freed up by the bond would be spent on teacher staffing. They also have argued that pushing a bond measure would make a parcel tax — which typically comes with fewer spending restrictions — politically unattainable in the future.
NEWS
March 7, 2011
Enough is enough! Friends, neighbors and community members constantly ask me why the teachers’ union leadership would actively oppose a bond measure that would help address state budget cuts to our local schools. Measure S, which will be presented to voters on the April 5 municipal election ballot, provides local funding to maintain quality education in our Glendale and Crescenta Valley schools. The funds generated here will stay local and be reinvested in our schools, which will help our children stay competitive in an ever-evolving global economy.
NEWS
By Megan O'Neil, megan.oneil@latimes.com | February 7, 2011
The organization dedicated to passing the $270-million school bond measure on the April 5 ballot opened its campaign headquarters at 936 Brand Blvd. last week. The Yes on S committee also launched a new website where residents can find additional information about the Measure S bond. “It is the start to all the volunteer work,” said committee co-chair Harry Hull. “It is a very professionally run campaign. There is going to be a slew of phone banks, yard signs, all kinds of stuff.